PUSAI vs STATE(NCT) OF DELHI. — Crl.A. No. 1485/2003
Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010009472003
Filing Date
12-Dec-2002
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1485/2003
Diary Number
947/2003
Order Date
04-Feb-2004
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUSAI
Adv. VIJAY PANJWANI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE(NCT) OF DELHI.
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Feb-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2003
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2003
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Nov-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2002
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1485/2003
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 1485/2003 – PUSAI v. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI Outcome: The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal on February 4, 2004. The appellant's conviction for offences under Sections 324 and 452 IPC was upheld, but the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone (1 year 5 months 15 days). The fine imposed was set aside, and bail bonds were discharged. Facts: The appellant stabbed a tenant (PW-2) on October 8, 1993, during a tenancy dispute. Witness PW-3 identified the appellant running from the victim's house. Lower courts convicted him and sentenced him to 2 years imprisonment under Section 324 and 3 years under Section 452 (both concurrent). Reasoning: The Court found the conviction justified but deemed the original sentence excessive given the time already served in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts