SHUBHAM PATEL vs STATE OF M.P — Crl.A. No. 1674/2026

Case under 1511Ab-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Anticipatory Bail Applications.) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010009222026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1674/2026

Diary Number

922/2026

Order Date

01-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511AB-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(SLPs arising out of anticipatory bail applications.) Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHUBHAM PATEL

    Adv. SANJEEV MALHOTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF M.P

    Adv. MRINAL GOPAL ELKER[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Fresh(Special)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1674/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shubham Patel v. State of M.P (Crl.A. No. 001674/2026) The Supreme Court disposed of Shubham Patel's appeal against the Madhya Pradesh High Court's rejection of his anticipatory bail in Crime No. 564/2022 (Section 406 IPC) by making its interim protection order absolute. The Court accepted Patel's argument that he was not appointed to run the procurement centre and had no entrustment, finding him implicated only due to his brother's procurement role. Patel must submit bail bonds within three weeks and provide undertakings to cooperate in investigation and not threaten witnesses or tamper evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case