A.P. QURESH/TRADERS M.AIDED COOP.SOCIETY vs STATE OF A.P. . — SLP(C) No. 2158/2004

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010009052004

Filing Date

12-Jan-2004

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 2158/2004

Diary Number

905/2004

Order Date

15-Nov-2007

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.P. QURESH/TRADERS M.AIDED COOP.SOCIETY

    Adv. C. S. N. MOHAN RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF A.P. .

    Adv. D. BHARATHI REDDY G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 29-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 10-Jul-2006

    ROPView PDF

  7. 10-Jul-2006

    ROPView PDF

  8. 10-Jul-2006

    ROPView PDF

  9. 10-Jul-2006

    ROPView PDF

  10. 10-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 03-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 27-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 09-Jan-2006

    ROPView PDF

  14. 04-Jan-2006

    ROPView PDF

  15. 19-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 12-Jan-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 2158/2004

  17. 07-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 2158/2004 Note: The hearing record provided concerns a consolidated batch of petitions (SLP 1804-1805, 2158, 2186 of 2004, and WP 25/2004), with the primary case being about a slaughterhouse closure order. On 15 November 2007, the Supreme Court dismissed SLP(C) No. 2158/2004 (along with related SLPs 1805 and 2186). The Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court's order directing closure of a slaughterhouse by 31 December 2003, irrespective of whether a new modern abattoir project was commissioned. Finding no grounds to interfere with the High Court's decision, the Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions. A related writ petition challenging a Municipal Corporation notice issued in compliance with the High Court order was also dismissed as the notice could not be challenged under Article 32. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case