BRIJ MOHAN JHA vs PRASHANT MEHTA . — SLP(C) No. 3971/2004

Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010008452004

Filing Date

09-Jan-2004

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 3971/2004

Diary Number

845/2004

Order Date

29-Mar-2007

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BRIJ MOHAN JHA

    Adv. NIRAJ SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRASHANT MEHTA .

    Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ASHIESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 10-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 04-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-May-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Apr-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Apr-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 03-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 08-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Jan-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 3971/2004

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 003971/2004 - Brij Mohan Jha v. Prashant Mehta On 29 March 2007, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition. The petitioner challenged a Junior Data Entry Operator selection process, and a Tribunal directed reconsideration on merits in 1999. After non-compliance, the petitioner filed contempt and review applications. The Tribunal found no contempt as no junior person was appointed, dismissing the review application. The High Court upheld this decision. The Supreme Court, finding a categorical finding that no person junior to the petitioner was appointed, saw no reason to interfere with concurrent factual findings and dismissed the petition with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case