COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,RAJKOT vs M/S. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. — C.A. No. 10825 - 10826/2010

Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010007992010

Filing Date

08-Jan-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 10825 - 10826/2010

Diary Number

799/2010

Order Date

04-Jul-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,RAJKOT

    Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.

    Adv. K. R. SASIPRABHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Nov-2020

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai

  3. 02-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 19-Sep-2012
  5. 31-Jul-2012
  6. 11-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 02-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 06-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 17-Nov-2011
  11. 21-Jul-2011
  12. 07-Jul-2011
  13. 14-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 02-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 10-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 19-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 22-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 27-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 08-Jan-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10825 - 10826/2010

  23. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 6033 - 6035/2009

casestatus.in Summary

On 19/09/2012, the Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 5714 of 2011 between the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (appellant) and M/S Reliance Industries Ltd. (respondent). Both parties submitted their respective statements of case and agreed no further steps were required. The court directed the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Court for substantive hearing as per Rule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case