INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL vs RAJINDER SINGH . — C.A. No. 97 - 98/2012
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010007692011
Filing Date
05-Jan-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 97 - 98/2012
Diary Number
769/2011
Order Date
22-Aug-2024
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2024 INSC 622
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
Adv. PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1] PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-2]
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJINDER SINGH .
Adv. SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-1] SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-2] SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-4] SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-5] SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-6] SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-9]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Aug-2024
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2024
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
24-Jul-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2024
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
18-Jul-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
29-May-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-May-2024
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
-
25-Mar-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 97 - 98/2012
-
[ 2024 INSC 622 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary: The Supreme Court allowed ICAR's appeal and reversed the Tribunal and High Court orders, holding that technical staff at IARI were not entitled to two advance increments upon acquiring a Ph.D. degree. The Court reasoned that the 1999 scheme providing these increments applied only to scientists in the Agricultural Research Service, as scientists and technical personnel are governed by separate service rules, recruitment criteria, cadres, and promotional avenues with distinct duties. Merely extending study leave regulations to technical staff did not entitle them to benefits specifically designed for scientists, and Article 14 does not apply to equate differently-situated employee categories with separate regulatory frameworks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts