GANESH MAHTO vs TIMAL MAHTO . — C.A. No. 5642/2006
Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010007412002
Filing Date
08-Jan-2002
Registration No
C.A. No. 5642/2006
Diary Number
741/2002
Order Date
03-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANESH MAHTO
Adv. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.TIMAL MAHTO .
Adv. S.K. SINHA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2002
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5642/2006
Case Summary: Ganesh Mahto v. Timal Mahto (C.A. No. 5642/2006) The Supreme Court allowed Ganesh Mahto's appeal and set aside the Jharkhand High Court's judgment dated 30.08.2001, which had reversed the concurrent dismissals by the trial court (1983) and lower appellate court (1985) regarding respondents' claim to raiyati (tenant) rights over suit land. The Court found the High Court's Single Judge erred by decreeing the suit without addressing three substantial questions of law that were framed regarding interpretation of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act and adverse possession claims. The matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh disposal of the appeal from appellate decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts