MUKTABAI vs DASHRATH ABA GUNGE (DEAD). — C.A. No. 981/2013

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010007152005

Filing Date

07-Jan-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 981/2013

Diary Number

715/2005

Order Date

13-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKTABAI

    Adv. SRIDHAR POTARAJU (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DASHRATH ABA GUNGE (DEAD).

    Adv. SHREE PAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan

  4. 03-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 03-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 03-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 14-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 24-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 04-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 16-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 16-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 15-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 24-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 02-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 02-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 21-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 07-Jan-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 981/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Muktabai v. Dashrath Aba Gunge The Supreme Court dismissed Muktabai's appeal challenging a specific performance decree favoring the respondent for enforcement of a 1969 agreement to sell property. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that Muktabai, as defendant No. 3 and daughter of one original defendant, was not a bona fide purchaser and lacked standing to challenge the decree after her father and uncle failed to appeal it. The Court protected her potential inheritance rights while clarifying that her 1979 sale deed would not impede execution of the decree in favor of respondent No. 1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case