BARKHA DINKAR vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH — Crl.A. No. 1059/2026

Case under 1511Misc-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Quashing Applications, Orders Framing Charge, Summoning Orders, Interim Orders in Criminal Matters, Withdrawal of Prosecution, Orders for Further Investigation/re-investigation Etc. Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010006162026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1059/2026

Diary Number

616/2026

Order Date

23-Feb-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511MISC-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(SLPs arising out of quashing applications, orders framing charge, summoning orders, interim orders in criminal matters, withdrawal of prosecution, orders for further investigation/re-investigation etc. Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BARKHA DINKAR

    Adv. VIKAS UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

    Adv. MRINAL GOPAL ELKER[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Feb-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi

  4. 08-Jan-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Jan-2026

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1059/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court allowed Barkha Dinkar's applications for permission to file a special leave petition against the High Court of Madhya Pradesh's December 17, 2025 judgment, and approved deletion of Respondent No.2. The Court issued notice returnable on February 23, 2026, and meanwhile restrained the High Court from taking any action against the petitioner or public prosecutor pursuant to the impugned judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case