SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER vs SRINIVASA RAO . — SLP(C) No. 15295 - 15304/2005
Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010006142005
Filing Date
05-Jan-2005
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 15295 - 15304/2005
Diary Number
614/2005
Order Date
28-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRINIVASA RAO .
Adv. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2005
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 15295 - 15304/2005
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 15295-15304/2005 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Land Acquisition Officer's petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court's decision. The Court upheld the Reference Court's compensation award of Rs. 7,000 per cent for Khushki land and Rs. 9,333 per cent for Bagayat land (significantly lower than the LAO's initial valuation of Rs. 1,50,000-2,00,000 per acre). Directions: The petitioner and concerned authorities were directed to pay the balance compensation amount along with statutory benefits to the landowners and/or their legal representatives via Demand Drafts within three months. The application for impleadment was dismissed as a sequel to the dismissal of the special leave petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts