INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. . vs UNION OF INDIA . — R.P.(C) No. 353/2003

Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010005342003

Filing Date

07-Jan-2003

Registration No

R.P.(C) No. 353/2003

Diary Number

534/2003

Order Date

07-Apr-2005

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section Z_NOT KNOWN

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. .

    Adv. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA .

    Adv. DEVENDRA SINGH MEHRA EJAZ MAQBOOL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2005

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 17-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 24-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 20-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 07-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 19-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 29-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Apr-2003
  14. 08-Apr-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Jan-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. R.P.(C) No. 353/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Indian Charge Chrome Ltd. v. Union of India R.P.(C) No. 353/2003 | Heard: 1 April 2005 The Supreme Court admitted review petitions filed by Indian Charge Chrome Ltd. challenging a December 2002 judgment that dismissed civil appeals regarding a chromite mining lease for Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. The Court found two manifest errors apparent on the record: (1) the judgment's failure to consider petitioners' contention that a critical June 30, 2001 clarification letter lacked proper state government authority, thereby vitiating the Central Government's subsequent approval; and (2) absence of opportunity for petitioners to address a Chief Minister's January 14, 1999 order relied upon to justify preferential treatment. The Court recalled the December 17, 2002 judgment and directed the civil appeals and transferred case be relisted for full hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case