LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST vs RAJ KUMAR . — C.A. No. 5930/2012

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010005162010

Filing Date

05-Jan-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 5930/2012

Diary Number

516/2010

Order Date

17-Aug-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST

    Adv. ARUN K. SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR .

    Adv. C. D. SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Sep-2011
  9. 11-Jul-2011
  10. 28-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 19-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 20-Oct-2010
  14. 06-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 31-Aug-2010
  16. 27-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Jul-2010
  18. 22-Apr-2010
  19. 30-Mar-2010
  20. 19-Mar-2010
  21. 01-Feb-2010
  22. 18-Jan-2010
  23. 11-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 05-Jan-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5930/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 005930/2012 (Ludhiana Improvement Trust v. Raj Kumar) The Supreme Court allowed eight consolidated civil appeals filed by Ludhiana Improvement Trust. The Court set aside the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order rejecting delay condonation petitions and directed the Commission to condone the delay on payment of ₹50,000 costs in each of the eight cases. Upon receipt of payment within six weeks, the Commission shall proceed to hear and dispose of the matters on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case