PARRKLAND AVENUE CO-OPERATIVE HSTY LTD. vs STATE OF GUAJARAT — C.A. No. 7787/2011

Case under Land Laws, Agricultural Tenancy, Land Revenue : Revenue Laws of States, Including Preemption, Collection of Land Revenue, Mutations, Correction of Land Records, Etc Section III-B. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010003732010

Filing Date

04-Jan-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 7787/2011

Diary Number

373/2010

Order Date

09-Feb-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Laws, Agricultural tenancy, Land Revenue : Revenue laws of States, including preemption, collection of land revenue, mutations, correction of land records, etc Section III-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARRKLAND AVENUE CO-OPERATIVE HSTY LTD.

    Adv. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] MOHIT D. RAM[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUAJARAT

    Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-2] DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1] DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-2]

Case History

  1. 09-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 09-Feb-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal

  3. 14-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Nov-2010
  6. 19-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 20-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Jan-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7787/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary On 09-02-2023, the Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 7787/2011 (with C.A. No. 7788/2011) between Parrkland Avenue Co-operative Housing Ltd. (appellant) and State of Gujarat & Anr. (respondents) before Justices V. Ramasubramanian and Pankaj Mithal. The Court directed the case to be listed after three weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case