RAM BACHAN RAI . vs RAM UDAR RAI . — C.A. No. 1100/2000

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010002431996

Filing Date

11-Feb-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 1100/2000

Diary Number

243/1996

Order Date

05-May-2006

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM BACHAN RAI .

    Adv. S. CHANDRA SHEKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM UDAR RAI .

    Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2006

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 05-May-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Jan-2006

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 18-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Dec-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 31-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Feb-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1100/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: RAM BACHAN RAI v. RAM UDAR RAI (C.A. No. 001100/2000) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and held that the execution application filed on 5.4.1991 was time-barred under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which prescribes a 12-year limitation period for executing decrees. The Court clarified that the limitation period begins from when the decree becomes enforceable (the date of decree: 3.5.1976), not from subsequent orders or dismissals of appeals. Accordingly, the High Court and Executing Court erred in allowing the execution application, and both their orders were set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case