BHIM SINGH vs U.O.I — W.P.(C) No. 21/1999

Case under Section X. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010002211999

Filing Date

04-Jan-1999

Registration No

W.P.(C) No. 21/1999

Diary Number

221/1999

Order Date

06-May-2010

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section X

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHIM SINGH

    Adv. DINESH KUMAR GARG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.O.I

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2010

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 21-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 20-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Dec-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 08-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 29-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 25-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 13-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 19-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 13-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 18-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 10-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 12-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 07-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 04-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 30-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 23-Aug-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 04-Jan-1999

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 21/1999

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Bhim Singh v. Union of India, W.P.(C) No. 000021/1999 The Supreme Court's Constitution Bench upheld the constitutional validity of the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLAD), rejecting petitioners' challenges. The Court held that Article 282 of the Constitution permits the Union to make grants for public purposes irrespective of whether the subject matter falls within the legislative competence of Parliament. The Scheme operates through Appropriation Acts passed annually by Parliament and maintains accountability through District Authorities who verify eligibility, execute works, and furnish completion and audit certificates. The Court found no violation of separation of powers since MPs' role is limited to recommending works while actual implementation rests with local authorities, and no unconstitutional infringement of Panchayat/Municipality functions since these bodies serve as preferred implementing agencies under the guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case