DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs M/S. MOTI BOARD INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. — C.A. No. 5300/2005

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010001762001

Filing Date

02-Jan-2001

Registration No

C.A. No. 5300/2005

Diary Number

176/2001

Order Date

29-Jul-2005

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. SAHARYA & CO.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. MOTI BOARD INDUSTRIES (P) LTD.

    Adv. PRADEEP MISRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 03-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 02-May-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 03-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Sep-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Sep-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 15-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 04-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 08-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 02-Jan-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5300/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 005300/2005 (Delhi Development Authority v. M/S. Moti Board Industries) On 29/07/2005, the Supreme Court (Justices Arijit Pasayat and H.K. Sema) heard this special leave petition challenging a High Court of Allahabad order from 01/08/2000. After hearing counsel for both the Delhi Development Authority (petitioner) and M/S. Moti Board Industries (respondent), the Court directed that the matter be called after three weeks for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case