RAMANI RAMASWAMY AND ANR vs PROBIR KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS — C.A. No. 2828 - 2832/2010
Case under Company Law, Sick Industries Including Disinvestment : Company Law, Sick Industries Including Disinvestment Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010001412010
Filing Date
04-Jan-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 2828 - 2832/2010
Diary Number
141/2010
Order Date
11-Jan-2024
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMANI RAMASWAMY AND ANR
Adv. SHARMILA UPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.PROBIR KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS
Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL GARVESH KABRA SHARMILA UPADHYAY[Caveat] SRIRAM P.[R-6]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jan-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
10-Jan-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
06-Dec-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2023
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
-
06-Dec-2023
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
-
12-May-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2022
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
11-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jan-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2828 - 2832/2010
Case Summary: C.A. No. 002828-002832/2010 On January 11, 2024, the Supreme Court heard civil appeals filed by Ramani Ramaswamy & Anr. against Probir Kumar Mishra & Ors. The Court found the appeals had become infructuous due to subsequent events and settlement between the parties, and accordingly disposed of the appeals. Any pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts