ELDER LAWYERS' ASSN.. vs STATE OF BIHAR — C.A. No. 11460/2014
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010001042012
Filing Date
02-Jan-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 11460/2014
Diary Number
104/2012
Order Date
16-Dec-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ELDER LAWYERS' ASSN..
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2014
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
05-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 11460/2014
-
09-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 011460 / 2014 - Elder Lawyers' Association v. State of Bihar The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging provisions in the Bihar State Advocates' Welfare Fund Act 1983 that exclude retired government employees receiving pension/gratuity from welfare fund membership. The Court upheld reasonable classification between advocates who joined the profession immediately after law school versus those who enrolled after retirement with existing financial security, finding this distinction rationally connected to the Act's objective of supporting advocates in genuine financial need. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts