A. SUBRAMANI vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — Crl.A. No. 2154/2010
Case under Section II-C. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010000982010
Filing Date
02-Jan-2010
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 2154/2010
Diary Number
98/2010
Order Date
09-Feb-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A. SUBRAMANI
Adv. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S. (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Feb-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
08-Feb-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
02-Feb-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
01-Feb-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
25-Jan-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
07-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jan-2010
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2154/2010
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 002154/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed A. Subramani's criminal appeal on February 9, 2023, declining to interfere with the High Court's judgment. The court directed Subramani to surrender before the concerned authority within six weeks to undergo the remaining sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts