NARINDER PAL SINGH vs U.T., CHANDIGARH . — C.A. No. 1356/2006

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010000132003

Filing Date

02-Jan-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 1356/2006

Diary Number

13/2003

Order Date

30-Apr-2007

Document Type

ROP

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARINDER PAL SINGH

    Adv. M. C. DHINGRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.T., CHANDIGARH .

    Adv. KAMINI JAISWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2007
  3. 09-Apr-2007
  4. 28-Feb-2006

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Feb-2006

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 31-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 10-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 25-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 22-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 12-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 18-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 13-Sep-2004
  14. 23-Aug-2004
  15. 12-Jul-2004
  16. 08-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 01-Aug-2003
  18. 06-May-2003
  19. 14-Apr-2003
  20. 07-Apr-2003
  21. 24-Mar-2003
  22. 17-Feb-2003
  23. 11-Feb-2003
  24. 20-Jan-2003
  25. 02-Jan-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1356/2006

  26. 16-Dec-2002
  27. 05-Dec-2002
  28. 22-Nov-2002
  29. 07-Oct-2002
  30. 27-Sep-2002
  31. 20-Sep-2002
  32. 16-Aug-2002
  33. 25-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 14-Sep-2001
  35. 01-Jan-1970
casestatus.in Summary

Note: The document provided relates to I.A. No.3 in Civil Appeal No.1353 of 2006 (Rajinder Singh Sidhu & Anr. v. U.T. Administration, Chandigarh), not the case referenced in your header (C.A. No. 001356/2006, Narinder Pal Singh v. U.T. Chandigarh). Summary: On 30 April 2007, the Supreme Court heard an interlocutory application seeking modification of the judgement. The Court found that Special Leave Petition (C) No.23737 of 2002 was inadvertently omitted from the last paragraph (Page 37) of the judgment and corrected this by substituting the paragraph to include all relevant special leave petitions. The Court disposed of the interlocutory application with directions that the High Court examine the issue of sewerage lines passing through allottees' buildings and their effect on possession handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case