NARINDER PAL SINGH vs U.T., CHANDIGARH . — C.A. No. 1356/2006
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010000132003
Filing Date
02-Jan-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 1356/2006
Diary Number
13/2003
Order Date
30-Apr-2007
Document Type
ROP
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARINDER PAL SINGH
Adv. M. C. DHINGRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.U.T., CHANDIGARH .
Adv. KAMINI JAISWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
28-Feb-2006
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2006
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2004
ROPView PDF
-
23-Aug-2004
ROPView PDF
-
12-Jul-2004
ROPView PDF
-
08-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
06-May-2003
ROPView PDF
-
14-Apr-2003
ROPView PDF
-
07-Apr-2003
ROPView PDF
-
24-Mar-2003
ROPView PDF
-
17-Feb-2003
ROPView PDF
-
11-Feb-2003
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2003
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2003
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1356/2006
-
16-Dec-2002
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2002
ROPView PDF
-
22-Nov-2002
ROPView PDF
-
07-Oct-2002
ROPView PDF
-
27-Sep-2002
ROPView PDF
-
20-Sep-2002
ROPView PDF
-
16-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2001
ROPView PDF
-
01-Jan-1970
ROPView PDF
Note: The document provided relates to I.A. No.3 in Civil Appeal No.1353 of 2006 (Rajinder Singh Sidhu & Anr. v. U.T. Administration, Chandigarh), not the case referenced in your header (C.A. No. 001356/2006, Narinder Pal Singh v. U.T. Chandigarh). Summary: On 30 April 2007, the Supreme Court heard an interlocutory application seeking modification of the judgement. The Court found that Special Leave Petition (C) No.23737 of 2002 was inadvertently omitted from the last paragraph (Page 37) of the judgment and corrected this by substituting the paragraph to include all relevant special leave petitions. The Court disposed of the interlocutory application with directions that the High Court examine the issue of sewerage lines passing through allottees' buildings and their effect on possession handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts