BALWANT KAUR RAJENDRA SINGH KHANDUJA vs RAJENDRA SINGH AMRIK SINGH KHANDUJA — T.P.(C) No. 570/2014

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010106772014

Filing Date

29-Mar-2014

Registration No

T.P.(C) No. 570/2014

Diary Number

10677/2014

Order Date

19-Jan-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALWANT KAUR RAJENDRA SINGH KHANDUJA

    Adv. ANURADHA MUTATKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA SINGH AMRIK SINGH KHANDUJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 22-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 16-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 28-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 28-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 29-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 25-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 25-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 23-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 29-Mar-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. T.P.(C) No. 570/2014

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: T.P.(C) No. 570 of 2014 Balwant Kaur sought transfer of her respondent Rajendra Singh's divorce petition from Pune Family Court. The Supreme Court initially issued notice (April 2014) and stayed divorce proceedings. However, the petitioner's counsel failed to effect proper service of notice on the respondent despite repeated opportunities given (Aug 2014–Feb 2016). On 19 January 2017, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court he did not wish to proceed, and the Transfer Petition was dismissed as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case