KATIKAPALLY RAJAIAH vs MALAN BEE — C.A. No. 12783/2025

Case under Land Laws, Agricultural Tenancy, Land Revenue : Abolition of Zamindari/jagirs/inams/estates, Land Reform Legislations, Agricultural Tenancy, Including Prohibition of Transfer of Land Belonging to Sc/st Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010106722023

Filing Date

14-Mar-2023

Registration No

C.A. No. 12783/2025

Diary Number

10672/2023

Order Date

16-Oct-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Laws, Agricultural tenancy, Land Revenue : Abolition of zamindari/jagirs/inams/estates, land reform legislations, agricultural tenancy, including prohibition of transfer of land belonging to SC/ST Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KATIKAPALLY RAJAIAH

    Adv. KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALAN BEE

    Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED[R-1] SHAKIL AHMAD SYED[R-2] SHAKIL AHMAD SYED[R-3] SHAKIL AHMAD SYED[R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Oct-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Oct-2025

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  4. 11-Aug-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Aug-2025

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria

  6. 09-May-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-May-2023

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar

  8. 09-May-2023

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar

  9. 02-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 12783/2025

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 012783 / 2025 The Supreme Court allowed appellant Katikapally Rajaiah's appeal against respondents Malan Bee & others, setting aside the High Court's judgment dated 10.10.2022. The dispute concerned land succession rights: respondents claimed to be legal heirs of a protected tenant and sought possession restoration, but the Court held that the mandatory procedure under Section 40 of the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1950 was not followed, and respondents' claim was fatally delayed (made 23 years after appellant's 1984 purchase). The Court restored the Joint Collector's 2023 order dismissing respondents' claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case