DHARAM SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC. vs THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ORS ETC — C.A. No. 1677 - 1691/2017
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010105982016
Filing Date
28-Mar-2016
Registration No
C.A. No. 1677 - 1691/2017
Diary Number
10598/2016
Order Date
21-Feb-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHARAM SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ORS ETC
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2017
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2017
ROPView PDF
-
03-Feb-2017
Office ReportView PDF
-
03-Feb-2017
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jan-2017
Office ReportView PDF
-
30-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2017
Office ReportView PDF
-
20-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2017
Office ReportView PDF
-
06-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jan-2017
Office ReportView PDF
-
04-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
16-Dec-2016
ROPView PDF
-
16-Dec-2016
ROPView PDF
-
06-Dec-2016
ROPView PDF
-
06-Dec-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2016
ROPView PDF
-
22-Nov-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
22-Nov-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2016
ROPView PDF
-
18-Nov-2016
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2016
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2016
ROPView PDF
-
28-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
28-Oct-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
28-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
24-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
24-Oct-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
24-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
17-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
17-Oct-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
17-Oct-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
17-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
03-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
03-Oct-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
03-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
28-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Sep-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
27-Sep-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
27-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
23-Sep-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
23-Sep-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
23-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-Aug-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
01-Aug-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
01-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jul-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
11-Jul-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
11-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
04-Jul-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
04-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jun-2016
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jun-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
29-Jun-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
29-Jun-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
29-Jun-2016
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2016
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-May-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-May-2016
ROPView PDF
-
02-May-2016
ROPView PDF
-
02-May-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
02-May-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
02-May-2016
ROPView PDF
-
06-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
06-Apr-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
06-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
04-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
01-Apr-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
01-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
28-Mar-2016
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1677 - 1691/2017
-
08-Mar-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
08-Mar-2016
ROPView PDF
-
26-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
26-Feb-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
26-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
16-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
16-Feb-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
16-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2016
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
27-Jan-2016
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-Dec-2015
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2015
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
13-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2015
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
13-Apr-2015
ROPView PDF
-
23-Mar-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
Case Summary: DHARAM SINGH & ORS. v. THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ORS (C.A. No. 001677-001691/2017) Outcome The Supreme Court allowed multiple consolidated civil appeals challenging the High Court's October 6, 2015 judgment. The Court held that post-acquisition allottees of land (including Maruti Suzuki India Limited) have no locus standi and are neither necessary nor proper parties in land acquisition compensation determination proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Key Rulings - Post-acquisition allottees cannot participate in compensation determination proceedings merely because they must pay enhanced compensation - The High Court's decision to impleaded MSIL as a party was set aside - Permission to adduce additional evidence at the appellate stage was found to be without merit under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC - Compensation continues to be determined between land owners and the acquiring authority (Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation) Next Steps The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law, with parties directed to appear on March 27, 2017. The compensation already paid to land owners would be subject to final orders of this Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts