SAU RAJANI vs SAU SMITA — C.A. No. 5216/2022

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010010422021

Filing Date

13-Jan-2021

Registration No

C.A. No. 5216/2022

Diary Number

1042/2021

Order Date

08-Aug-2022

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2022 INSC 805

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAU RAJANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAU SMITA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Aug-2022

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Aug-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Feb-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5216/2022

  6. [ 2022 INSC 805 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court admitted the Special Leave to Appeal petition filed by Sau Rajani against the Bombay High Court's judgment, issuing notice to respondents Sau Smita and others. The petitioner argued that nuisance claims fall outside the jurisdiction of authorities under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act 1976, and that jurisdictional bars do not apply to non-eviction proceedings. The Court directed the respondents to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks, with final disposal to follow thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case