UNION OF INDIA vs JAI KUMAR JAIN ETC.ETC. — SLP(C) No. 35457 - 35626/2012

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010103222012

Filing Date

26-Mar-2012

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 35457 - 35626/2012

Diary Number

10322/2012

Order Date

25-Mar-2015

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAI KUMAR JAIN ETC.ETC.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 20-Mar-2015
  7. 20-Mar-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  8. 20-Mar-2015
  9. 20-Mar-2015
  10. 16-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 16-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Mar-2015
  13. 13-Mar-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  14. 13-Mar-2015
  15. 23-Feb-2015
  16. 23-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  17. 23-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  18. 23-Feb-2015
  19. 16-Feb-2015
  20. 16-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  21. 16-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  22. 16-Feb-2015
  23. 13-Feb-2015
  24. 13-Feb-2015
  25. 09-Feb-2015
  26. 09-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  27. 09-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  28. 09-Feb-2015
  29. 01-Dec-2014
  30. 01-Dec-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  31. 12-Sep-2014
  32. 12-Sep-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  33. 12-Sep-2014
  34. 01-Sep-2014
  35. 01-Sep-2014
  36. 01-Sep-2014
  37. 01-Sep-2014
  38. 14-Aug-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  39. 14-Aug-2014
  40. 21-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  41. 21-Jul-2014
  42. 18-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  43. 18-Jul-2014
  44. 11-Jul-2014
  45. 10-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  46. 10-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  47. 10-Jul-2014
  48. 07-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  49. 07-Jul-2014
  50. 04-Jul-2014
  51. 25-Apr-2014
  52. 25-Apr-2014
  53. 23-Apr-2014
  54. 21-Apr-2014
  55. 04-Apr-2014
  56. 31-Mar-2014
  57. 14-Mar-2014
  58. 24-Feb-2014
  59. 17-Feb-2014
  60. 03-Feb-2014
  61. 27-Jan-2014
  62. 20-Jan-2014
  63. 20-Jan-2014
  64. 20-Jan-2014
  65. 02-Dec-2013
  66. 02-Dec-2013
  67. 25-Oct-2013
  68. 04-Oct-2013
  69. 04-Oct-2013
  70. 27-Sep-2013
  71. 27-Sep-2013
  72. 23-Sep-2013
  73. 17-Sep-2013
  74. 06-Sep-2013
  75. 29-Aug-2013
  76. 26-Aug-2013
  77. 05-Aug-2013
  78. 02-Aug-2013
  79. 22-Jul-2013
  80. 15-Jul-2013
  81. 05-Jul-2013
  82. 02-Jul-2013
  83. 06-May-2013
  84. 03-May-2013
  85. 03-May-2013
  86. 12-Apr-2013
  87. 13-Mar-2013
  88. 29-Jan-2013
  89. 04-Dec-2012
  90. 04-Dec-2012
  91. 04-Dec-2012
  92. 09-Nov-2012
  93. 10-Oct-2012
  94. 31-Aug-2012
  95. 09-Aug-2012
  96. 17-Jul-2012
  97. 26-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 35457 - 35626/2012

  98. 16-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  99. 30-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  100. 21-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  101. 01-Apr-2011
  102. 11-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  103. 14-Feb-2011
  104. 07-Feb-2011
  105. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  106. 17-Jan-2011
  107. 14-Jan-2011
  108. 07-Jan-2011
  109. 06-Jan-2011
  110. 16-Dec-2010
  111. 29-Nov-2010
  112. 15-Nov-2010
  113. 18-Oct-2010
  114. 27-Sep-2010
  115. 13-Sep-2010
  116. 30-Aug-2010
  117. 25-Aug-2010
  118. 12-Jul-2010
  119. 05-Jul-2010
casestatus.in Summary

I need to provide a summary of the specific case SLP(C) 35457-35626/2012 with Jai Kumar Jain as respondent. Let me search through the document for information about this case. Based on my review of the hearing record, here is the summary: SLP(C) NOS. 35457-35626/2012 - Union of India vs. Jai Kumar Jain and Others Outcome: The Supreme Court DISMISSED all the special leave petitions filed by the Union of India. Case Details: These SLPs challenged a batch of High Court judgments dated 7th August 2009 from the Bombay High Court that dealt with the validity of Sections 245HA(1)(iv) and 245HA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended by the Finance Act 2007. High Court's Position: The Bombay High Court found these sections to be violative of Article 14 (right to equality) but instead of invalidating the provisions, it read down Section 245HA(1)(iv) to avoid declaring the provisions unconstitutional. Supreme Court's Decision: On 25th March 2015, the Court (Justices A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman) found the High Court's judgment to be "well-considered" and did not find any reason for interference. Accordingly, all special leave petitions and connected appeals were dismissed. No further action was ordered on these matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case