M/S TRACTORS & FARM EQUIPMENTS LTD. vs COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.BANGALORE — C.A. No. 3768 - 3769/2011
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010102382011
Filing Date
30-Mar-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 3768 - 3769/2011
Diary Number
10238/2011
Order Date
15-Dec-2015
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S TRACTORS & FARM EQUIPMENTS LTD.
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.BANGALORE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2015
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
17-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2014
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2014
ROPView PDF
-
22-Oct-2013
ROPView PDF
-
22-Oct-2013
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
12-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
05-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
07-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
10-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3768 - 3769/2011
-
25-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
15-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
26-Nov-2009
ROPView PDF
-
07-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
25-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
07-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
24-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
23-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 003768-003769/2011 The Supreme Court held that pre-delivery inspection (PDI) charges and free after-sales service (ASS) charges incurred by dealers should NOT be included in the assessable value for central excise duty purposes. The Court ruled that since dealers undertake these activities as routine business practice and incur costs from their dealer margins (without reimbursement from manufacturers), such expenses cannot be considered part of the transaction value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. Accordingly, the assessees' appeals were allowed and the Department's appeals dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts