M/S TRACTORS & FARM EQUIPMENTS LTD. vs COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.BANGALORE — C.A. No. 3768 - 3769/2011

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010102382011

Filing Date

30-Mar-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 3768 - 3769/2011

Diary Number

10238/2011

Order Date

15-Dec-2015

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S TRACTORS & FARM EQUIPMENTS LTD.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.BANGALORE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Dec-2015

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 03-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 27-Oct-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 15-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Oct-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Oct-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 17-Dec-2014
  16. 17-Dec-2014
  17. 19-Aug-2014
  18. 20-Jan-2014
  19. 22-Oct-2013
  20. 22-Oct-2013
  21. 29-Aug-2013
  22. 12-Aug-2013
  23. 24-Jul-2013
  24. 17-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 01-Mar-2013
  26. 20-Feb-2013
  27. 05-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 09-Jan-2013
  29. 26-Nov-2012
  30. 19-Nov-2012
  31. 07-Nov-2012
  32. 03-Jul-2012
  33. 10-May-2012
  34. 06-Jan-2012
  35. 06-Jan-2012
  36. 25-Jul-2011
  37. 08-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 30-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3768 - 3769/2011

  39. 25-Jan-2010
  40. 15-Dec-2009
  41. 26-Nov-2009
  42. 07-Oct-2009
  43. 25-Aug-2009
  44. 30-Jul-2009
  45. 07-Jul-2009
  46. 24-Apr-2009
  47. 23-Mar-2009
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 003768-003769/2011 The Supreme Court held that pre-delivery inspection (PDI) charges and free after-sales service (ASS) charges incurred by dealers should NOT be included in the assessable value for central excise duty purposes. The Court ruled that since dealers undertake these activities as routine business practice and incur costs from their dealer margins (without reimbursement from manufacturers), such expenses cannot be considered part of the transaction value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. Accordingly, the assessees' appeals were allowed and the Department's appeals dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case