THIPPERUDRAPPA vs THIPPAMMA(D) BY LRS.. — C.A. No. 10221/2010
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010101862010
Filing Date
30-Mar-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 10221/2010
Diary Number
10186/2010
Order Date
11-Feb-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THIPPERUDRAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THIPPAMMA(D) BY LRS..
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Apr-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 10221/2010
Case Summary: CA No. 10221/2010 Thipperudrappa v. Thippamma (D) by LRS The Supreme Court dismissed Thipperudrappa's special leave appeal on February 11, 2021, which challenged the High Court of Karnataka's dismissal of his second appeal (RSA No.1695/2007 dated 04.11.2009). The three-judge bench found no reason to interfere with the concurrent factual findings recorded by the lower courts and upheld the earlier judgments against the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts