C.I.T. vs SONHARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. — C.A. No. 6965/2012
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010101692010
Filing Date
30-Mar-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 6965/2012
Diary Number
10169/2010
Order Date
25-Sep-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C.I.T.
Respondent(s)
-
1.SONHARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
23-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
21-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
30-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
05-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
20-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
02-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
28-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Dec-2010
ROPView PDF
-
10-Dec-2010
ROPView PDF
-
22-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2010
ROPView PDF
-
04-Oct-2010
ROPView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
13-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
07-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Mar-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6965/2012
-
15-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 006965/2012 C.I.T. v. Sonhari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. On September 25, 2012, the Supreme Court heard consolidated appeals by the Income Tax Department challenging whether sugar cooperatives must include in taxable income the difference between market price and concessional rates charged to farmer-members. The Court remitted all matters to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for de-novo consideration, directing investigation into whether concessional sales constitute industry practice, whether State Government resolutions support the practice, and the basis for monthly sale quantities. The appeals were disposed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts