JAYAMMA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR REVENUE (REGISTRATION) — C.A. No. 4213/2018

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010100872018

Filing Date

16-Mar-2018

Registration No

C.A. No. 4213/2018

Diary Number

10087/2018

Order Date

19-Apr-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 08-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR REVENUE (REGISTRATION)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2018
  3. 16-Mar-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4213/2018

  4. 05-May-2017
  5. 05-May-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  6. 05-May-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  7. 05-May-2017
  8. 28-Apr-2017
  9. 28-Apr-2017
  10. 20-Apr-2017
  11. 20-Apr-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  12. 20-Apr-2017
  13. 13-Apr-2017
  14. 13-Apr-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  15. 13-Apr-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  16. 13-Apr-2017
  17. 24-Mar-2017
  18. 24-Mar-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  19. 24-Mar-2017
  20. 21-Mar-2017
  21. 21-Mar-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  22. 21-Mar-2017
  23. 03-Mar-2017
  24. 03-Mar-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  25. 03-Mar-2017
  26. 14-Feb-2017
  27. 14-Feb-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  28. 14-Feb-2017
  29. 06-Feb-2017
  30. 06-Feb-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  31. 06-Feb-2017
  32. 11-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 11-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 06-Jan-2017
  35. 06-Jan-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  36. 06-Jan-2017
  37. 16-Dec-2016
  38. 16-Dec-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  39. 16-Dec-2016
  40. 07-Dec-2016
  41. 07-Dec-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  42. 07-Dec-2016
  43. 28-Nov-2016
  44. 28-Nov-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  45. 28-Nov-2016
  46. 16-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 16-Nov-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 16-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 15-Nov-2016
  50. 15-Nov-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  51. 15-Nov-2016
  52. 07-Oct-2016
  53. 07-Oct-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  54. 07-Oct-2016
  55. 26-Sep-2016
  56. 26-Sep-2016
  57. 26-Sep-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  58. 26-Sep-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  59. 26-Sep-2016
  60. 26-Sep-2016
  61. 22-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  62. 22-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  63. 22-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 19-Sep-2016
  65. 19-Sep-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  66. 19-Sep-2016
  67. 09-Sep-2016
  68. 09-Sep-2016
  69. 09-Sep-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  70. 09-Sep-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  71. 09-Sep-2016
  72. 09-Sep-2016
  73. 29-Aug-2016
  74. 29-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  75. 29-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  76. 29-Aug-2016
  77. 12-Aug-2016
  78. 12-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  79. 12-Aug-2016
  80. 11-Aug-2016
  81. 11-Aug-2016
  82. 05-Aug-2016
  83. 05-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  84. 05-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  85. 05-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  86. 05-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  87. 05-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  88. 05-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  89. 05-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  90. 05-Aug-2016
  91. 05-Aug-2016
  92. 22-Jul-2016
  93. 22-Jul-2016
  94. 20-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  95. 20-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  96. 20-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  97. 11-Jul-2016
  98. 11-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  99. 11-Jul-2016
  100. 12-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  101. 12-May-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  102. 12-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  103. [ 2018 INSC 367 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 4019/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court granted permission to file the Special Leave Petitions challenging the Hyderabad High Court's order dated 23/12/2015, and condoned the delay in filing. The Court issued notice to the respondents and clarified that property registration may proceed, but expressly subject to the final outcome of these SLPs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case