. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 vs M/S HINDUJA VENTRUES LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 1429/2018

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010100512012

Filing Date

25-Sep-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 1429/2018

Diary Number

10051/2012

Order Date

31-Jan-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 07-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S HINDUJA VENTRUES LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2017
  3. 27-Mar-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  4. 27-Mar-2017
  5. 20-Mar-2017
  6. 20-Mar-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  7. 20-Mar-2017
  8. 06-Feb-2017
  9. 06-Feb-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  10. 06-Feb-2017
  11. 16-Dec-2016
  12. 16-Dec-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  13. 16-Dec-2016
  14. 02-Sep-2016
  15. 02-Sep-2016
  16. 16-Aug-2016
  17. 16-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  18. 16-Aug-2016
  19. 08-Aug-2016
  20. 08-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  21. 08-Aug-2016
  22. 19-Jul-2016
  23. 19-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  24. 19-Jul-2016
  25. 05-Jul-2016
  26. 05-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  27. 05-Jul-2016
  28. 30-Jun-2016
  29. 30-Jun-2016
  30. 30-Jun-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  31. 30-Jun-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  32. 30-Jun-2016
  33. 30-Jun-2016
  34. 29-Jun-2016
  35. 29-Jun-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  36. 29-Jun-2016
  37. 11-May-2016
  38. 11-May-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  39. 11-May-2016
  40. 01-Apr-2016
  41. 01-Apr-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  42. 01-Apr-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  43. 03-Mar-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  44. 05-Jan-2016
  45. 05-Jan-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  46. 05-Jan-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  47. 05-Jan-2016
  48. 11-Dec-2015
  49. 11-Dec-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  50. 11-Dec-2015
  51. 02-Nov-2015
  52. 02-Nov-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  53. 02-Nov-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  54. 02-Nov-2015
  55. 24-Sep-2015
  56. 24-Sep-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  57. 24-Sep-2015
  58. 21-Sep-2015
  59. 21-Sep-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  60. 21-Sep-2015
  61. 28-Aug-2015
  62. 28-Aug-2015
  63. 14-Aug-2015
  64. 14-Aug-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  65. 13-Aug-2015
  66. 13-Aug-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  67. 13-Aug-2015
  68. 27-Jul-2015
  69. 27-Jul-2015
  70. 20-Jul-2015
  71. 20-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  72. 20-Jul-2015
  73. 10-Jul-2015
  74. 10-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  75. 10-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  76. 10-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  77. 10-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  78. 10-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  79. 10-Jul-2015
  80. 08-Jul-2015
  81. 08-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  82. 08-Jul-2015
  83. 21-Apr-2015
  84. 21-Apr-2015
  85. 17-Apr-2015
  86. 17-Apr-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  87. 17-Apr-2015
  88. 06-Apr-2015
  89. 06-Apr-2015
  90. 06-Apr-2015
  91. 06-Apr-2015
  92. 06-Apr-2015
  93. 06-Apr-2015
  94. 26-Feb-2015
  95. 26-Feb-2015
  96. 25-Feb-2015
  97. 25-Feb-2015
  98. 19-Jan-2015
  99. 19-Jan-2015
  100. 07-Jan-2015
  101. 07-Jan-2015
  102. 18-Dec-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  103. 18-Dec-2014
  104. 21-Nov-2014
  105. 21-Nov-2014
  106. 27-Oct-2014
  107. 27-Oct-2014
  108. 12-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  109. 12-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  110. 24-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  111. 24-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  112. 24-Jul-2014
  113. 09-May-2014
  114. 30-Apr-2014
  115. 30-Apr-2014
  116. 29-Apr-2014
  117. 29-Apr-2014
  118. 03-Apr-2014
  119. 31-Mar-2014
  120. 06-Mar-2014
  121. 03-Mar-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  122. 03-Mar-2014
  123. 28-Feb-2014
  124. 28-Oct-2013
  125. 08-Oct-2013
  126. 30-Sep-2013
  127. 30-Sep-2013
  128. 27-Sep-2013
  129. 16-Sep-2013
  130. 13-Sep-2013
  131. 13-Sep-2013
  132. 13-Sep-2013
  133. 09-Sep-2013
  134. 23-Aug-2013
  135. 08-Aug-2013
  136. 05-Aug-2013
  137. 29-Jul-2013
  138. 29-Jul-2013
  139. 12-Jul-2013
  140. 01-Jul-2013
  141. 12-Apr-2013
  142. 08-Apr-2013
  143. 06-Mar-2013
  144. 08-Feb-2013
  145. 04-Feb-2013
  146. 14-Jan-2013
  147. 14-Jan-2013
  148. 09-Jan-2013
  149. 30-Nov-2012
  150. 23-Nov-2012
  151. 09-Nov-2012
  152. 29-Oct-2012
  153. 08-Oct-2012
  154. 05-Oct-2012
  155. 28-Sep-2012
  156. 25-Sep-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1429/2018

  157. 21-Sep-2012
  158. 06-Aug-2012
  159. 23-Jul-2012
  160. 20-Jul-2012
  161. 16-Jul-2012
  162. 16-Jul-2012
  163. 09-Jul-2012
  164. 02-Mar-2012
  165. 17-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  166. [ 2018 INSC 79 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 2165/2012

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: C.A. No. 001429 / 2018 (C.A. No. 2165/2012 - Commissioner of Income Tax-8 v. M/S Hinduja Ventures Ltd.) The Supreme Court of India ruled on whether Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules 1962 has prospective or retrospective applicability to pending income tax assessments. Key Facts: - Assessment Year 2003-2004 for M/S Essar Teleholdings Ltd - The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs 26 crores of interest under Section 14A relating to exempt dividend income - This was challenged through the CIT(A), ITAT, and High Court Court's Decision: The Supreme Court held that Rule 8D is prospective in operation and applies from Assessment Year 2008-09 onwards, not to earlier pending assessments. The Court's reasoning: 1. Section 14A was inserted in 2001 with retrospective effect from 1962 2. However, Section 14A(2) and (3), inserted in 2006, explicitly stated applicability from assessment year 2007-08 onwards 3. Rule 8D, which prescribes the methodology for computing expenditure under Section 14A(2)-(3), was inserted on 24.03.2008 4. The Finance Bill's explanatory notes and CBDT Circular 14/2006 (Para 11.3) clearly stated applicability "from assessment year 2007-08 onwards" 5. Rule 8D was amended again in 2016, changing the computation methodology, confirming prospective operation Next Steps: All 45+ connected civil appeals and SLPs filed by the Revenue were dismissed. The matter has far-reaching implications for assessments relating to exempt income disallowances under Section 14A across multiple assessment years pending before various tax authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case