M/S AURO TEXTILE vs COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.CHANDIGARH — C.A. No. 4612/2010
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010100372010
Filing Date
29-Mar-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 4612/2010
Diary Number
10037/2010
Order Date
04-Mar-2016
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 07-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S AURO TEXTILE
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.CHANDIGARH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2016
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
10-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
27-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
07-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
14-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
10-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
31-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
30-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4612/2010
-
04-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 004612/2010 This case, consolidated with multiple appeals concerning knitted garment manufacturers, addressed whether exemption benefits under Central Excise Notifications 14/02-CE and 15/02-CE applied when manufacturers didn't produce documents proving duty payment on input fabrics. The Supreme Court ruled that Explanation II to these notifications creates a legal fiction deeming textile yarns and fabrics "duty paid" even without documentary proof, making exemption available to manufacturers who don't claim CENVAT credit. Assessees' appeals were allowed; Revenue appeals dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts