MR G S PATNAIK vs TARA SINGH — C.A. No. 1738/2015

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010001002013

Filing Date

02-Jan-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 1738/2015

Diary Number

100/2013

Order Date

14-Aug-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR G S PATNAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TARA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Feb-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 04-Feb-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 22-Oct-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 13-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 31-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 31-Aug-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 31-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 29-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 29-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 01-May-2014
  20. 31-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 07-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 27-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 04-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 10-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 26-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 29-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 04-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 02-Jan-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1738/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 001738/2015 (MR G S PATNAIK v. TARA SINGH) On August 14, 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals filed by Mr. G S Patnaik and another against Tara Singh, finding no ground to interfere with the High Court's orders. The Court stipulated that the impugned orders shall not be treated as precedent, and disposed of all pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case