SUKH PAL SINGH H V NANDWANA vs STATE OF RAJ AND ANR — CW/24243/2017
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC021151112017
Filing Number
CW/51003/2017
Filing Date
19-Dec-2017
Registration No
CW/24243/2017
Registration Date
22-Dec-2017
Judge
Munnuri Laxman
Coram
Munnuri Laxman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Matters relating to removal, dismissal, termination from service ( 502 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKH PAL SINGH H V NANDWANA
-
2.Sukh Pal Singh S/o Shri Ram Lal
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJ AND ANR
Adv. ,AMITOSH PAREEK 1123
-
2.State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary to the Government, Social Justice and Empowerment Department
Adv. NALIN G. NARAIN
-
3.Director, Social Justice and Empowerment Department, Government of Rajasthan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Munnuri LaxmanView PDF
The Rajasthan High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the dismissal order of a District Social Welfare Officer accused of fraudulently withdrawing Rs. 1.77 lakhs, finding that the disciplinary enquiry was vitiated by procedural irregularities. The court held that even though the petitioner was absent during enquiry, the department was obligated to formally examine witnesses and properly place documents on record, rather than relying on informally submitted documents. The matter was remanded for fresh enquiry with directions to treat the interim period as deemed suspension and pay 50% subsistence allowance to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Munnuri LaxmanView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Ashok Kumar JainView PDF
-
12-Sep-2024
Anoop Kumar DhandView PDF
-
06-Dec-2021
Mahendar Kumar GoyalView PDF
-
13-Dec-2019
Sanjeev Prakash SharmaView PDF
-
18-Feb-2019
Inderjeet SinghView PDF
-
25-Apr-2018
Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF
-
08-Jan-2018
Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF
-
19-Dec-2017
Case filed
Registration No. CW/24243/2017
The Rajasthan High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the dismissal order of a District Social Welfare Officer accused of fraudulently withdrawing Rs. 1.77 lakhs, finding that the disciplinary enquiry was vitiated by procedural irregularities. The court held that even though the petitioner was absent during enquiry, the department was obligated to formally examine witnesses and properly place documents on record, rather than relying on informally submitted documents. The matter was remanded for fresh enquiry with directions to treat the interim period as deemed suspension and pay 50% subsistence allowance to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts