MUSMAT EDI BEGAM D/O PEERU W/O SHABUDEEN vs HASAN — CW /1130/2026
Case under Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section 212. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 30th March 2026.
CNR: RJHC021132672025
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
CW /64502/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
CW /1130/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Judge
ANUROOP SINGHI
Coram
ANUROOP SINGHI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUSMAT EDI BEGAM D/O PEERU W/O SHABUDEEN
Adv. ASGAR KHAN
Respondent(s)
HASAN
IQBAL
RUKSANA D/O IBRAHIM
ASIF
MUSTAFA
HALIMA
FARJANA D/O YUSUF
MU. UMEDAN
SHAUKAT
LIYAKAT
YUNUS
FARUK
ABDUL KARIM
JAMIL
DAULAT BANO D/O RAMJAN
MU. KHATUN
SHABBIR
ISLAM
BABU
JARINA
SHAKILA
JULEKHA
SONADI
NASIM
JANNAT D/O BASHIR
KHATIJA D/O MARHUM PEERU W/O NIJAMUDIN CHAUHAN
IQBAL S/O MOHAMMAD AMIN
KHALID S/O MOHAMMAD SHAFI
TEHSILDAR, SIKAR
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI
FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY) |
Orders
Case Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), Sikar to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending application filed under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, which had been pending since 2021. The court mandated the SDO to decide the matter within two weeks of the petitioner filing an appropriate follow-up application, after providing both parties a hearing opportunity, without prejudging the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), Sikar to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending application filed under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, which had been pending since 2021. The court mandated the SDO to decide the matter within two weeks of the petitioner filing an appropriate follow-up application, after providing both parties a hearing opportunity, without prejudging the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts