MUSMAT EDI BEGAM D/O PEERU W/O SHABUDEEN vs HASAN — CW/1130/2026
Case under Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section 212. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 30th March 2026.
CNR: RJHC021132672025
Filing Number
CW/64502/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
CW/1130/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Judge
Anuroop Singhi
Coram
Anuroop Singhi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUSMAT EDI BEGAM D/O PEERU W/O SHABUDEEN
Adv. ASGAR KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.HASAN
-
2.IQBAL
-
3.RUKSANA D/O IBRAHIM
-
4.ASIF
-
5.MUSTAFA
-
6.HALIMA
-
7.FARJANA D/O YUSUF
-
8.MU. UMEDAN
-
9.SHAUKAT
-
10.LIYAKAT
-
11.YUNUS
-
12.FARUK
-
13.ABDUL KARIM
-
14.JAMIL
-
15.DAULAT BANO D/O RAMJAN
-
16.MU. KHATUN
-
17.SHABBIR
-
18.ISLAM
-
19.BABU
-
20.JARINA
-
21.SHAKILA
-
22.JULEKHA
-
23.SONADI
-
24.NASIM
-
25.JANNAT D/O BASHIR
-
26.KHATIJA D/O MARHUM PEERU W/O NIJAMUDIN CHAUHAN
-
27.IQBAL S/O MOHAMMAD AMIN
-
28.KHALID S/O MOHAMMAD SHAFI
-
29.TEHSILDAR, SIKAR
-
30.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Anuroop SinghiView PDF
Case Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), Sikar to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending application filed under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, which had been pending since 2021. The court mandated the SDO to decide the matter within two weeks of the petitioner filing an appropriate follow-up application, after providing both parties a hearing opportunity, without prejudging the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CW/1130/2026
Case Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), Sikar to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending application filed under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, which had been pending since 2021. The court mandated the SDO to decide the matter within two weeks of the petitioner filing an appropriate follow-up application, after providing both parties a hearing opportunity, without prejudging the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts