ENT BHATTA SANGH BHARATPUR vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - RAHUL LODHA — CW/20021/2025
Case under The Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 Section NO. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
CNR: RJHC021115322025
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
Filing Number
CW/63409/2025
Filing Date
15-12-2025
Registration No
CW/20021/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Judge
ANUROOP SINGHI
Coram
ANUROOP SINGHI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Mines, Minerals and Mining Leases ( 900 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ENT BHATTA SANGH BHARATPUR
Adv. PRIYANSHA GUPTA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - RAHUL LODHA
JOINT SECRETARY, GOVT OF RAJASTHAN
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
MINING ENGINEER, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
Hearing History
Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI
FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-12-2025 | FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY) |
Orders
The Rajasthan High Court adjourned the matter to 14.07.2026, requesting the State's Advocate General to assist in determining whether the figure '150' in the brick kiln royalty calculation formula denotes 150 days or another measure. The Court found the respondents' affidavits unsatisfactory in justifying the multiplier and noted that the Supreme Court's NCR Brick Kiln Association order limiting operations to 122 days may impact the proportionality of the royalty calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Rajasthan High Court adjourned the matter to 14.07.2026, requesting the State's Advocate General to assist in determining whether the figure '150' in the brick kiln royalty calculation formula denotes 150 days or another measure. The Court found the respondents' affidavits unsatisfactory in justifying the multiplier and noted that the Supreme Court's NCR Brick Kiln Association order limiting operations to 122 days may impact the proportionality of the royalty calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts