JEEVAN LAL SON OF NATHULAL MEENA, vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMP/8593/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Dec-2024

CNR: RJHC021072382024

Filing Number

CRLMP/48628/2024

Filing Date

12-Dec-2024

Registration No

CRLMP/8593/2024

Registration Date

16-Dec-2024

Judge

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Coram

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions under Section 482 CrPC ( 204 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JEEVAN LAL SON OF NATHULAL MEENA,

    Adv. ABDUL WAHID NAQVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.PRADEEP SINGH SON OF GIRDHAR SINGH,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Anoop Kumar DhandView PDF

    Case Summary: The Rajasthan High Court dismissed Jeevan Lal's petition challenging the District Collector's order requiring him to deposit vehicle insurance amount to release his impounded vehicle. The court held that since Section 7(3) of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act, 1995 provides a statutory appeal remedy to the Divisional Commissioner, the petitioner must exhaust this appellate remedy before approaching the High Court, and cannot bypass it. The petition was disposed, granting the petitioner four weeks to file the statutory appeal, which the Appellate Authority will decide expeditiously on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    For Admission- Notice Not Issued

  4. 11-Feb-2025

    Vinod Kumar BharwaniView PDF

  5. 12-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMP/8593/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Rajasthan High Court dismissed Jeevan Lal's petition challenging the District Collector's order requiring him to deposit vehicle insurance amount to release his impounded vehicle. The court held that since Section 7(3) of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act, 1995 provides a statutory appeal remedy to the Divisional Commissioner, the petitioner must exhaust this appellate remedy before approaching the High Court, and cannot bypass it. The petition was disposed, granting the petitioner four weeks to file the statutory appeal, which the Appellate Authority will decide expeditiously on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case