JITENDRA KUMAR SAINI S/O SHRI SHRIRAM SAINI vs SUFIYAN S/O SAJID SAIYAD — CMA/429/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Mar-2024

CNR: RJHC021064852023

Filing Number

CMA/58432/2023

Filing Date

21-Dec-2023

Registration No

CMA/429/2024

Registration Date

17-Jan-2024

Judge

Ashutosh Kumar (V.j.)

Coram

Ashutosh Kumar (V.j.)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Compensation Matters (MACT) ( 1700 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA KUMAR SAINI S/O SHRI SHRIRAM SAINI

    Adv. RAM DAYAL SAINI

  2. 2.VIRENDRA SAINI S/O SHRI JITENDRA KUMAR SAINI

  3. 3.ROSHNI KUMARI D/O SHRI JITENDRA KUMAR SAINI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUFIYAN S/O SAJID SAIYAD

  2. 2.MOHAMMED FAROOK NAYAK S/O ABDUL JABBAR NAYAK

  3. 3.AAKIB S/O MOHAMMED RAFEEK KHAN

  4. 4.IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. CHANDERDEEP SINGH JODHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Ashutosh Kumar (V.j.)View PDF

    Case Summary: CMA/429/2024 Court Decision: The Rajasthan High Court partially allowed the appeal, increasing compensation from ₹8,56,894 to ₹14,48,688. The court recalculated the deceased's monthly income at ₹11,886 (with 40% future income increase), rejected the 25% negligence deduction for not wearing a helmet, awarded ₹1,32,000 as consortium damages (₹44,000 per dependent), and increased funeral/loss of property claims to ₹33,000 combined, with 8% annual interest from filing date. Key Reasoning: Following Supreme Court precedent (*Anjana Narayan Kamble*), the court held that traffic violations alone don't justify compensation reduction without proof that accident avoidance was possible. The deceased's student status justified using an 18-multiplier on adjusted income, and dependent family members deserved enhanced consortium compensation per established judicial principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    For Admission- Notice Served

  4. 12-Mar-2024

    Uma Shanker VyasView PDF

  5. 21-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/429/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA/429/2024 Court Decision: The Rajasthan High Court partially allowed the appeal, increasing compensation from ₹8,56,894 to ₹14,48,688. The court recalculated the deceased's monthly income at ₹11,886 (with 40% future income increase), rejected the 25% negligence deduction for not wearing a helmet, awarded ₹1,32,000 as consortium damages (₹44,000 per dependent), and increased funeral/loss of property claims to ₹33,000 combined, with 8% annual interest from filing date. Key Reasoning: Following Supreme Court precedent (*Anjana Narayan Kamble*), the court held that traffic violations alone don't justify compensation reduction without proof that accident avoidance was possible. The deceased's student status justified using an 18-multiplier on adjusted income, and dependent family members deserved enhanced consortium compensation per established judicial principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case