MKC INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA — WMAP/516/2025

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: RJHC021056292025

e-Filing Number

27-11-2025

Filing Number

WMAP/59959/2025

Filing Date

28-Nov-2025

Registration No

WMAP/516/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Judge

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma , Baljinder Singh Sandhu

Coram

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma , Baljinder Singh Sandhu

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DB Writ Petitions which are not covered under any of the above sub categories ( 4401 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MKC INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.

    Adv. CHANDRA SHEKHAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

  2. 2.GENERAL MANAGER

  3. 3.CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CONSTRUCTION)

  4. 4.CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION)- IV

  5. 5.DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION)

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    Sanjeev Prakash Sharma,baljinder Singh SandhuView PDF

    Summary: In WMAP/516/2025, MKC Infrastructure Ltd. filed a writ miscellaneous application against the Union of India and North Western Railway officials. On 12/05/2026, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the application had become infructuous and was not being pressed. The High Court of Rajasthan accordingly dismissed the application as not pressed, and all pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jan-2026

    Sanjeev Prakash Sharma,baljinder Singh SandhuView PDF

  4. 28-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WMAP/516/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WMAP/516/2025, MKC Infrastructure Ltd. filed a writ miscellaneous application against the Union of India and North Western Railway officials. On 12/05/2026, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the application had become infructuous and was not being pressed. The High Court of Rajasthan accordingly dismissed the application as not pressed, and all pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case