SMT. MANOJI DEVI W/O RAMAVTAR, vs SANJAY PRAJAPATI S/O SHANTILAL , Advocate - AMIT SHARMA — CMA/286/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: RJHC021052012023

Filing Number

CMA/57686/2023

Filing Date

18-Dec-2023

Registration No

CMA/286/2024

Registration Date

11-Jan-2024

Judge

Sandeep Taneja

Coram

Sandeep Taneja

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Compensation Matters (MACT) ( 1700 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MANOJI DEVI W/O RAMAVTAR,

    Adv. SANDEEP JAIN

  2. 2.HIMESH S/O RAMAVTAR

  3. 3.MANGILAL S/O MOTILAL

  4. 4.SODRA W/O MANGILAL

  5. 5.VANDANA D/O MANGILAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY PRAJAPATI S/O SHANTILAL , Advocate - AMIT SHARMA

  2. 2.RAJESH S/O DOODHNATH

  3. 3.NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,

    Adv. AMAR NATH PAREEK,AMAR NATH PAREEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Sandeep TanejaView PDF

    Summary The Rajasthan High Court allowed the appeal and enhanced the motor accident compensation awarded to five dependents of a deceased. The lower tribunal had granted only a lump sum of Rs. 44,000 for loss of consortium, but the court ruled that under Supreme Court precedent (Pranay Sethi and Nanuram cases), each of the five claimants (wife, son, father, mother, and sister) is separately entitled to Rs. 40,000, increasing the total to Rs. 2,00,000. The respondents were directed to pay an additional Rs. 1,56,000 within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Sandeep TanejaView PDF

  4. 19-Jan-2024

    Narendra Singh DhaddhaView PDF

  5. 18-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/286/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court allowed the appeal and enhanced the motor accident compensation awarded to five dependents of a deceased. The lower tribunal had granted only a lump sum of Rs. 44,000 for loss of consortium, but the court ruled that under Supreme Court precedent (Pranay Sethi and Nanuram cases), each of the five claimants (wife, son, father, mother, and sister) is separately entitled to Rs. 40,000, increasing the total to Rs. 2,00,000. The respondents were directed to pay an additional Rs. 1,56,000 within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case