AFSAR S/O BHURA, GAJENDER SINGH RATHORE, ,SIYA RAM SHARMA,JASWANT SINGH RATHOR vs MS. OMVAY BUILD STATE PRIVATE LIMITED, — CFA/1463/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: RJHC021046262024
e-Filing Number
04-12-2024
Filing Number
CFA/57203/2024
Filing Date
05-Dec-2024
Registration No
CFA/1463/2024
Registration Date
17-Dec-2024
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Specific Performance of Contract Matters ( 2800 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AFSAR S/O BHURA, GAJENDER SINGH RATHORE, ,SIYA RAM SHARMA,JASWANT SINGH RATHOR
-
2.ASLAM S/O BHURA,
Adv. Gajender Singh Rathore
-
3.SAHABDEEN S/O BHURA,
Adv. Gajender Singh Rathore
-
4.SARIF S/O BHURA
Adv. Gajender Singh Rathore
-
5.MISHRU S/O BHURA,
Adv. Gajender Singh Rathore
Respondent(s)
-
1.MS. OMVAY BUILD STATE PRIVATE LIMITED,
-
2.MST. MUHRBI W/O BHURA MEV2.
-
3.NASAR S/O BHURA,2.
-
4.SHRIYAM S/O BHURA MEV
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Incomplete
-
11-May-2026
Chandra Prakash ShrimaliView PDF
Case Summary: CFA/1463/2024 Outcome: The High Court of Rajasthan adjourned the proceedings and suspended the execution application (No. 2/2025) pending before the District Judge. The court directed that Respondent No. 1 be served notice via registered mail and issued instructions for the case to be listed after four weeks. The court ordered that upon appearance of all respondents, fresh directions on stay would be issued after hearing both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Chandra Prakash ShrimaliView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
Maneesh Sharma (V.j.)View PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Shubha MehtaView PDF
-
26-Sep-2025
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
02-Jan-2025
Narendra Singh DhaddhaView PDF
-
05-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CFA/1463/2024
Case Summary: CFA/1463/2024 Outcome: The High Court of Rajasthan adjourned the proceedings and suspended the execution application (No. 2/2025) pending before the District Judge. The court directed that Respondent No. 1 be served notice via registered mail and issued instructions for the case to be listed after four weeks. The court ordered that upon appearance of all respondents, fresh directions on stay would be issued after hearing both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts