SAMEER SON YAKUB(Legal Heir) vs ANSAR KHAN SON OF SABDULLA Advocate - TEEKA RAM MEENA, ,ADITYA KHANDELWAL — CFA/1949/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
CNR: RJHC021039332025
e-Filing Number
24-11-2025
Filing Number
CFA/58964/2025
Filing Date
24-Nov-2025
Registration No
CFA/1949/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Civil First Appeals which are not covered under any of the above sub categories ( 3800 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAMEER SON YAKUB(Legal Heir)
Adv. NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA 1.
-
2.MUNTAZ KHAN SON SAMEER1.
-
3.MUSTAQ KHAN SON SAMEER1.
-
4.SMT. TOFAN DAUGHTER OF SAMEER WIFE OF LATE RAHMATYA1.
-
5.SMT. TASHLEEM DAUGHTER OF SAMEER WIFE OF SALIM KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANSAR KHAN SON OF SABDULLA Advocate - TEEKA RAM MEENA, ,ADITYA KHANDELWAL
-
2.LIAQAT ALI SON OF DINA KHAN
-
3.HARIRAM SON OF HARDEVA
-
4.BABULAL SON HARISHANKAR
-
5.LAND HOLDER TEHSILDAR
-
6.SUB-REGISTRAR
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jul-2026
For Orders- On Application
-
13-May-2026
Chandra Prakash ShrimaliView PDF
Case Summary: CFA/1949/2025 In Civil First Appeal No. 1949/2025 before the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur, appellant Sameer Son Yakub challenged a decision against respondent Ansar Khan Son Of Sabdulla. On 13/05/2026, Justice Chandra Prakash Shrimali adjourned the case, ordering that the matter be listed after four weeks. The appellant was absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jan-2026
Shubha MehtaView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CFA/1949/2025
Case Summary: CFA/1949/2025 In Civil First Appeal No. 1949/2025 before the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur, appellant Sameer Son Yakub challenged a decision against respondent Ansar Khan Son Of Sabdulla. On 13/05/2026, Justice Chandra Prakash Shrimali adjourned the case, ordering that the matter be listed after four weeks. The appellant was absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts