SMT. MANBHAR DEVI MEENA WIFE OF LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH MEENA, vs RAMLAL MEENA SON OF SHRI CHEETAR MEENA, — CMA/367/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC021036102025

e-Filing Number

21-11-2025

Filing Number

CMA/58761/2025

Filing Date

24-Nov-2025

Registration No

CMA/367/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Compensation Matters (MACT) ( 1700 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MANBHAR DEVI MEENA WIFE OF LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH MEENA,

    Adv. SANDEEP MATHUR

  2. 2.SMT. RESHAMI MEENA WIFE OF LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH MEENA,

  3. 3.SHER SINGH MEENA SON OF LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH MEENA,

  4. 4.SONAKSHI MEENA DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH MEENA,

  5. 5.VEER SINGH MEENA SON OF LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH MEENA

  6. 6.SRI RAMKARAN MEENA SON OF LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH MEENA,

  7. 7.SMT. NANGI DEVI MEENA WIFE OF SHRI RAMKARAN MEENA,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMLAL MEENA SON OF SHRI CHEETAR MEENA,

  2. 2.MOHAMMAD JAMAL KHAN SON OF SHRI SAMSUDDEN KHAN,

  3. 3.SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,

Case History

  1. 21-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Sandeep TanejaView PDF

    In Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 367/2026 before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, the court granted the appellant's counsel four weeks' time to remove defects pointed out by the Registry. The case has been adjourned to allow the appellant to cure the procedural deficiencies before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/367/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 367/2026 before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, the court granted the appellant's counsel four weeks' time to remove defects pointed out by the Registry. The case has been adjourned to allow the appellant to cure the procedural deficiencies before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case