DHIRENDRA S/O SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMP/7373/2019

Case under Other Acts Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 27th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Nov-2019

CNR: RJHC021029542019

Filing Number

CRLMP/42506/2019

Filing Date

20-Nov-2019

Registration No

CRLMP/7373/2019

Registration Date

21-Nov-2019

Judge

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Coram

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions under Section 482 CrPC ( 204 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

27-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHIRENDRA S/O SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR

    Adv. SAURABH BHANDARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.SMT. DEVI CHAUDHARY D/O SHRI PAWAN CHAUDHARY

    Adv. DESHRAJ KALWANIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-May-2026

    Anoop Kumar DhandView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash FIR No. 556/2019 for rape (Sections 376(2)(n), 313, 315 IPC), rejecting his argument based on a compromise affidavit from the prosecutrix. The court held that rape is a heinous, non-compoundable offense with serious societal impact, and proceedings cannot be quashed merely on victim-offender settlement; the petitioner may submit representations to the investigating officer instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2026

    For Admission- Notice Not Issued

  4. 14-May-2026

    Anoop Kumar DhandView PDF

  5. 20-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMP/7373/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to quash FIR No. 556/2019 for rape (Sections 376(2)(n), 313, 315 IPC), rejecting his argument based on a compromise affidavit from the prosecutrix. The court held that rape is a heinous, non-compoundable offense with serious societal impact, and proceedings cannot be quashed merely on victim-offender settlement; the petitioner may submit representations to the investigating officer instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case