GOPAL AGARWAL S/O DR. BHOLA RAM AGARWAL vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CW/18204/2025

Case under Rajasthan Housing Board Act, 1970 Section NO. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Next hearing 30-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020986002025

Filing Number

CW/55937/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

CW/18204/2025

Registration Date

21-Nov-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Cases Pertaining to Rajasthan Housing Board ( 6000 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Housing Board Act, 1970 Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL AGARWAL S/O DR. BHOLA RAM AGARWAL

    Adv. SAMIT BISHNOI

  2. 2.SANJEEV MAHNA S/O LATE SHRI SATYAPAL MAHNA

  3. 3.SANJAY KUMAR MATHUR S/O LATE SHRI RAMESH CHANDRA MATHUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD THROUGH CHAIRMAN

    Adv. AJAY SHUKLA

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER, RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

    Adv. JYOTI SHARMA

  4. 4.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JAIPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION-GREATER

  5. 5.MR. MITHA LAL MEENA

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Sameer JainView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Rajasthan admitted the civil writ petition filed by Gopal Agarwal challenging unauthorized constructions under the Rajasthan Housing Board Scheme and the government's inaction on his representations. The court issued notice to respondents returnable in three weeks, directed the petitioner's counsel to serve the petition on the Board's standing counsel, and permitted direct service ('dasti') on other respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Maneesh SharmaView PDF

  4. 25-Nov-2025

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  5. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/18204/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Rajasthan admitted the civil writ petition filed by Gopal Agarwal challenging unauthorized constructions under the Rajasthan Housing Board Scheme and the government's inaction on his representations. The court issued notice to respondents returnable in three weeks, directed the petitioner's counsel to serve the petition on the Board's standing counsel, and permitted direct service ('dasti') on other respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case