SHREE RAM COLONY B VIKAS SAMITI vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - JAI LODHA, ,DARSH PAREEK,AJAY SHUKLA,RAGHAV SHARMA,GAJANAND MISHRA MANAV ADDL GC,MINAKSHI JAIN GC,MANOJ SHARMA AAG — CW/16978/2019

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: RJHC020875252019

Filing Number

CW/51501/2019

Filing Date

30-Sep-2019

Registration No

CW/16978/2019

Registration Date

01-Oct-2019

Judge

Ganesh Ram Meena

Coram

Ganesh Ram Meena

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act ( 5800 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHREE RAM COLONY B VIKAS SAMITI

    Adv. ASHISH SHARMA,DEEPAK SHARMA,DEEPAK SHARMA, ,DEEPAK SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - JAI LODHA, ,DARSH PAREEK,AJAY SHUKLA,RAGHAV SHARMA,GAJANAND MISHRA MANAV ADDL GC,MINAKSHI JAIN GC,MANOJ SHARMA AAG

  2. 2.THE RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

    Adv. JAYANTI SAHAYA GAUR

  3. 3.THE JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. RAM KUMAR SHARMA

  4. 4.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

    Adv. PRAKASH ASRANI

  5. 5.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

    Adv. SHEETANSHU SHARMA

  6. 6.REGISTRAR

    Adv. S.S. RAGHAV AAG

  7. 7.JAIPUR VIDHYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

    Adv. IMRAN KHAN ADDL GC

  8. 8.JAWAHARPURI BHAWAN NIRMAN SAHAKARI SAMITI LTD

    Adv. S N MEENA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF

    Case Summary The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a 2002 judgment directing the Jaipur Development Authority to issue property deeds was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation, and therefore nullified it. The court found that petitioners had concealed material facts (specifically, that no "Shree Ram Colony-B" scheme existed before land acquisition) and failed to implead necessary parties, thereby vitiating the entire judgment despite it having attained finality at the Supreme Court level. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Nov-2025

    Anil Kumar UpmanView PDF

  4. 27-Oct-2025

    Anil Kumar UpmanView PDF

  5. 25-Aug-2025

    Sameer JainView PDF

  6. 04-Nov-2024

    Anoop Kumar DhandView PDF

  7. 17-Oct-2023

    Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF

  8. 13-Oct-2023

    Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF

  9. 04-Oct-2023

    Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF

  10. 12-Apr-2023

    Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF

  11. 01-Mar-2023

    Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF

  12. 09-Sep-2022

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  13. 05-Aug-2022

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  14. 13-Jul-2022

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  15. 12-May-2022

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  16. 11-Apr-2022

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  17. 15-Feb-2022

    Sameer JainView PDF

  18. 09-Feb-2022

    Sameer JainView PDF

  19. 11-Jan-2022

    Sameer JainView PDF

  20. 09-Dec-2021

    Pankaj BhandariView PDF

  21. 30-Nov-2021

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  22. 10-Nov-2021

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  23. 30-Sep-2021

    Dinesh MehtaView PDF

  24. 08-Sep-2021

    Sanjeev Prakash SharmaView PDF

  25. 25-Aug-2021

    Sanjeev Prakash SharmaView PDF

  26. 05-Aug-2021

    Sanjeev Prakash SharmaView PDF

  27. 20-Jul-2021

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  28. 07-Apr-2021

    Sanjeev Prakash SharmaView PDF

  29. 31-Jul-2020

    Mahendar Kumar GoyalView PDF

  30. 31-Jul-2020

    Mahendar Kumar GoyalView PDF

  31. 05-Mar-2020

    Mahendar Kumar GoyalView PDF

  32. 03-Feb-2020

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  33. 24-Jan-2020

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  34. 16-Jan-2020

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  35. 10-Dec-2019

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  36. 30-Oct-2019

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  37. 04-Oct-2019

    Ashok Kumar GaurView PDF

  38. 30-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/16978/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a 2002 judgment directing the Jaipur Development Authority to issue property deeds was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation, and therefore nullified it. The court found that petitioners had concealed material facts (specifically, that no "Shree Ram Colony-B" scheme existed before land acquisition) and failed to implead necessary parties, thereby vitiating the entire judgment despite it having attained finality at the Supreme Court level. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case