RAMBEER SON OF SHRI SATYAVEER vs N.I.A. Advocate - SNEH DEEP KHYALIYA — CRLAD/472/2025
Case under National Investigation Agency Act Section 21. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020874592025
e-Filing Number
03-10-2025
Filing Number
CRLAD/37643/2025
Filing Date
04-Oct-2025
Registration No
CRLAD/472/2025
Registration Date
12-Nov-2025
Judge
Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal
Coram
Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Other Criminal matters ( 113 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMBEER SON OF SHRI SATYAVEER
Adv. MANISH KUMAR MEENA
Respondent(s)
-
1.N.I.A. Advocate - SNEH DEEP KHYALIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF
Summary The Rajasthan High Court dismissed Rambeer's bail appeal in a murder case involving Rashtriya Rajput Karni Sena chief Sukhdev Singh Gogamedi. The court found prima facie evidence of the appellant's involvement in the conspiracy through the chargesheet, including evidence that he provided shelter, fake identity documents, and facilitated the escape of co-accused Nitin. Since charges under Section 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (Chapter IV) were framed against him, Section 43D(5) restricted bail eligibility, and the court determined he failed to establish insufficient evidence against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Orders- Misc. Cases
-
10-Feb-2026
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,sameer JainView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,sameer JainView PDF
-
15-Jan-2026
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,chandra Prakash ShrimaliView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,baljinder Singh SandhuView PDF
-
04-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLAD/472/2025
Summary The Rajasthan High Court dismissed Rambeer's bail appeal in a murder case involving Rashtriya Rajput Karni Sena chief Sukhdev Singh Gogamedi. The court found prima facie evidence of the appellant's involvement in the conspiracy through the chargesheet, including evidence that he provided shelter, fake identity documents, and facilitated the escape of co-accused Nitin. Since charges under Section 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (Chapter IV) were framed against him, Section 43D(5) restricted bail eligibility, and the court determined he failed to establish insufficient evidence against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts