PRABHAT @ BITTU S/O RASAL SINGH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — SOSA/2146/2025

Case under Other Acts Section no. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: RJHC020866252025

Filing Number

SOSA/37302/2025

Filing Date

29-Sep-2025

Registration No

SOSA/2146/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Judge

Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal

Coram

Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section no

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAT @ BITTU S/O RASAL SINGH

    Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR SOGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

    Summary: The Rajasthan High Court allowed Prabhat's application to suspend his life sentence pending appeal of his conviction under Section 302 IPC (read with Section 120B) for murder. The court found that the conviction relied primarily on call detail records showing his mobile conversation with a co-accused on the incident date, with no direct allegations against him except presence in the room, and noted he remained on bail during trial without misuse. He was released on bail with conditions requiring annual court appearances and address notifications until appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,sameer JainView PDF

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,chandra Prakash ShrimaliView PDF

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,chandra Prakash ShrimaliView PDF

  8. 29-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. SOSA/2146/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Rajasthan High Court allowed Prabhat's application to suspend his life sentence pending appeal of his conviction under Section 302 IPC (read with Section 120B) for murder. The court found that the conviction relied primarily on call detail records showing his mobile conversation with a co-accused on the incident date, with no direct allegations against him except presence in the room, and noted he remained on bail during trial without misuse. He was released on bail with conditions requiring annual court appearances and address notifications until appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case