RAJESH KUMAR S/O SHRI MOHAN LAL vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR — WRW/189/2025

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: RJHC020857192025

Filing Number

WRW/48713/2025

Filing Date

25-Sep-2025

Registration No

WRW/189/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Judge

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Coram

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Other Civil ordinary matters which are not covered under any of the above sub categories ( 4201 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

25-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR S/O SHRI MOHAN LAL

    Adv. HEMANT TAYLOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT COLLECTOR

  2. 2.GRAM PANCHAYAT

  3. 3.RAI SINGH S/O KISHANLAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-May-2026

    Mahendar Kumar GoyalView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court dismissed Rajesh Kumar's review petition challenging a February 2025 order that had dismissed his original writ petition challenging the Gram Panchayat's land allotment (Patta). The court found no error in the earlier order, noting that Rule 157 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules 1996—which governs regularization of old buildings—was not followed before the Patta was issued, and the revisional authority's finding that Kumar had no old house on the subject land remained unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Orders- On Application

  4. 25-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRW/189/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court dismissed Rajesh Kumar's review petition challenging a February 2025 order that had dismissed his original writ petition challenging the Gram Panchayat's land allotment (Patta). The court found no error in the earlier order, noting that Rule 157 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules 1996—which governs regularization of old buildings—was not followed before the Patta was issued, and the revisional authority's finding that Kumar had no old house on the subject land remained unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case