DINESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI GANESH LAL CHOUDHARY vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - VIDYADHAR GATHALA — CW /14026/2025
Case under Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section NO. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020794682025
Next Hearing
16th September 2025
Filing Number
CW /45240/2025
Filing Date
09-09-2025
Registration No
CW /14026/2025
Registration Date
10-09-2025
Judge
ANUROOP SINGHI
Coram
ANUROOP SINGHI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Matters against the orders of Board of Revenue ( 1804 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DINESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI GANESH LAL CHOUDHARY
Adv. S. N. KUMAWAT, ,NAVAL KISHORE MALI
SMT. SHEELA CHOUDHARY W/O SHRI DINESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY
SMT. SANTOSH W/O SHRI MADHO BEHARI GUPTA
SURYA NARAIN S/O SHRI RAM GOPAL
RAMBABU S/O SHRI RAM SWAROOP AGARWAL
SANJEEV KUMAR S/O SHRI MOOL SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - VIDYADHAR GATHALA
THE TEHSILDAR
THE PATWARI HALKA
Hearing History
Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI
FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-09-2025 | FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY) |
Orders
Summary: The Rajasthan High Court quashed the Tehsildar's order dated 30.01.2025 rejecting the petitioners' representation, finding it arbitrary and lacking reasoned justification beyond a bare reference to Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. The court held that the Tehsildar violated the rule of law by disregarding prior binding orders from the Board of Revenue (07.09.2015) and the High Court itself (11.01.2024), and directed the Tehsildar to reconsider the representation afresh within four weeks, strictly in accordance with those earlier orders and with proper reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Rajasthan High Court quashed the Tehsildar's order dated 30.01.2025 rejecting the petitioners' representation, finding it arbitrary and lacking reasoned justification beyond a bare reference to Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. The court held that the Tehsildar violated the rule of law by disregarding prior binding orders from the Board of Revenue (07.09.2015) and the High Court itself (11.01.2024), and directed the Tehsildar to reconsider the representation afresh within four weeks, strictly in accordance with those earlier orders and with proper reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts