OM SINGH S/O LATE DEVI SINGH, vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLAD/387/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 413. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020764532025
e-Filing Number
29-08-2025
Filing Number
CRLAD/32825/2025
Filing Date
29-Aug-2025
Registration No
CRLAD/387/2025
Registration Date
10-Sep-2025
Judge
Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal
Coram
Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Criminal Appeals against acquittal ( 106 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.OM SINGH S/O LATE DEVI SINGH,
Adv. MAHESH GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN
-
2.RAJU SINGH S/O. CHAJU SINGH,
-
3.SINTU SINGH S/O. BABUSINGH,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed Om Singh's appeal against the acquittal of Raju Singh and Sintu Singh in a murder case (Section 302 IPC). The court found that the trial court's acquittal was based on a plausible view of the evidence and that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies contained significant contradictions regarding timing, location, and presence at the incident scene. The appellate court upheld the acquittal, finding no legal or factual error warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
For Admission- Notice Not Issued
-
13-Apr-2026
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,sameer JainView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
Mahendar Kumar Goyal,sangeeta SharmaView PDF
-
29-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLAD/387/2025
Case Summary The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed Om Singh's appeal against the acquittal of Raju Singh and Sintu Singh in a murder case (Section 302 IPC). The court found that the trial court's acquittal was based on a plausible view of the evidence and that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies contained significant contradictions regarding timing, location, and presence at the incident scene. The appellate court upheld the acquittal, finding no legal or factual error warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts